This walks you through writing NIH, NSF, and foundation grant proposals by forcing you to answer the four questions reviewers actually care about: testable hypothesis, why now, what's genuinely new, and can you actually do it. The workflow is structured around an eight-step checklist covering everything from specific aims to compliance, with section-by-section frameworks that show exactly what goes in significance versus innovation versus approach. It includes a specific aims template, reviewer mindset guidance, and an evaluation rubric requiring a minimum 3.5 average score. Use it when drafting R01s, revising after getting triaged, or reality-checking whether your "innovative approach" statement actually says anything specific.
npx -y skills add lyndonkl/claude --skill grant-proposal-assistant --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Select a file.
juliusbrussee/caveman
mattpocock/skills
shadcn/improve
obra/superpowers
forrestchang/andrej-karpathy-skills
vercel-labs/skills