Agenda Intelligence MD

Product runtime and evidence-discipline layer for strategic intelligence agents. One core service layer behind four delivery surfaces — MCP server, HTTP API, A2A adapter, and a deployable Cloudflare Worker baseline — plus structured per-product contracts, geography-routed reasoning, schema validation, evidence audit, and scoring. Ships with five vertical workers, all deployed: Middle Corridor Deal Risk Gate, CIS Secondary-Sanctions Exposure, Agentic Interaction Trust Gate, Gulf Maritime Exposure Gate, and Kazakhstan Market-Entry Readiness Gate.

Read it as a trust-routing layer for agent-mediated decisions: it turns a partial evidence pack into a structured routing decision — allow, step up, escalate, or not-decision-ready — surfaces the specific missing evidence, and always requires human review for high-stakes actions. It does not approve, clear, or make a factual determination, and does not verify factual truth. Live retrieval is off by default and opt-in per worker profile (see the CIS worker and ADR 0014). Evaluate any worker in a few minutes with live curl calls: docs/agenstry/demo-pack.md.

Why a repo full of markdown?

The skills under skills/ and the canon docs are source, not documentation — a SKILL.md is instructions an agent loads and executes, the way a runtime loads a module. The Python in src/ is the runtime that composes them: global-think-tank-analyst as the reasoning method, central-asia-caspian and gulf-middle-east as regional layers (module roles in llms.txt / agent-manifest.json). Both are version-controlled for the same reason — they're what runs.

First run

pip install agenda-intelligence-md
agenda-intelligence doctor
agenda-intelligence validate-brief examples/agenda-brief.json
agenda-intelligence score examples/agenda-brief.json --evidence examples/source/evidence-pack.json

doctor reports package and MCP-server status; validate-brief confirms a brief matches agenda-brief.schema.json; score returns a heuristic 0–100 number with a structure / evidence / decision-readiness breakdown. Full end-to-end analyze trace (request → routing → memo → validation → audit → score) with reproducibility script: examples/product-shell/full-analyze-trace/.

Optional, only if you want analyze to call the Anthropic API itself rather than letting your host model complete from the returned system prompt:

pip install "agenda-intelligence-md[llm]"
export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=...

Longer guided tutorial: docs/quickstart.md. MCP client setup: docs/integrations/mcp.md.

Live A2A wrapper

A free Cloudflare Workers wrapper is live for discovery, uptime checks, lightweight strategic-risk triage, and A2A/JSON-RPC routing. Six workers are deployed (general triage + the five vertical workers); per-worker endpoints live in each worker section below and in the Status table.

• Interactive browser demos: Middle Corridor Deal Risk Gate · CIS Secondary-Sanctions Exposure
• General wrapper: https://agenda-intelligence-a2a.vassiliy-lakhonin.workers.dev · agent card · JSON-RPC · Agenstry
• Worked curl calls for every worker: docs/agenstry/demo-pack.md · repeatable Kazakhstan test: docs/agenstry/kazakhstan-live-test.md · announcement: docs/announcements/live-a2a-wrapper.md

Try the flagship live:

curl -X POST https://middle-corridor-deal-risk-gate-a2a.vassiliy-lakhonin.workers.dev/message/send \
  -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  -H 'x-client-id: live-demo' \
  -d @examples/kazakhstan-middle-corridor/live-agent-request.json

Expected: JSON-RPC 2.0 with triage_recommendation: "escalate_before_signature", route/cargo/value extraction, supplied-source detection, the minimum evidence still missing before go, and human-review escalation.

The hosted wrapper is intentionally limited: no payments, no wallets, no factual-truth verification, and no legal/financial/compliance advice. Live retrieval is off by default and opt-in per vertical-worker profile only (currently cis_secondary_sanctions; see ADR 0014 and SOURCE_POLICY.md). Private usage stats: deploy/cloudflare-worker/README.md. Full product behavior remains in the installable stdio MCP server.

Flagship commercial use case

Kazakhstan / Middle Corridor Deal Risk Gate is the focused commercial proposition for logistics, trade-finance, procurement, insurance, and compliance-adjacent workflows:

Route + cargo + counterparties + dated sources -> auditable corridor-risk triage, evidence gaps, source coverage, watch-next indicators, and human-review escalation.

The structured response also presence-flags sanctions-relevant / high-risk and re-export / circumvention-watch counterparty jurisdictions, decomposes risk into a domestic-legal vs foreign-sanctions exposure view, and surfaces a vessel deceptive-shipping-practice checklist for the maritime leg. All of this is presence-flagging and evidence triage routed to human review — not a sanctions determination.

Live A2A listing:

• Endpoint: https://middle-corridor-deal-risk-gate-a2a.vassiliy-lakhonin.workers.dev/message/send
• Agent card: https://middle-corridor-deal-risk-gate-a2a.vassiliy-lakhonin.workers.dev/.well-known/agent-card.json
• Agenstry: https://agenstry.com/agents/middle-corridor-deal-risk-gate-a2a.vassiliy-lakhonin.workers.dev
• Use-case notes: docs/use-cases/kazakhstan-middle-corridor.md
• Example pack: examples/kazakhstan-middle-corridor/
• Repeatable live test: docs/agenstry/kazakhstan-live-test.md

This use case is a pre-compliance evidence and decision-readiness gate. It is not legal, compliance, sanctions, financial, investment, or insurance advice.

The product-grade structured JSON contract is documented in docs/use-cases/kazakhstan-middle-corridor.md, with schemas and fixtures under examples/kazakhstan-middle-corridor/contract/.

Kazakhstan market-entry readiness contract

Kazakhstan Market Entry Readiness Gate is a structured contract pack for distribution, import, service, showroom, EPC, renewable-energy, infrastructure, technology-transfer, and partner-entry files:

Company + project + Kazakhstan objective + counterparties + supplied sources -> gate decision, readiness label, evidence gaps, claim audit, owner actions, watch-next indicators, and human-review routing.

It is a live vertical worker: a kazakhstan_market_entry_readiness service function, an HTTP route, an A2A profile, and a deployed Cloudflare Worker at https://kazakhstan-market-entry-readiness-a2a.vassiliy-lakhonin.workers.dev. It is not legal, compliance, customs, tax, financial, investment, insurance, sanctions, or launch-authorization advice.

• Use-case notes: docs/use-cases/kazakhstan-market-entry-readiness.md
• Request schema: schemas/v1/market-entry-readiness-request.schema.json
• Response schema: schemas/v1/market-entry-readiness-response.schema.json
• Source taxonomy: source-requirements/kazakhstan-market-entry-readiness.json
• Example pack: examples/kazakhstan-market-entry-readiness/contract/
• HTTP: POST /v1/market-entry/readiness
• A2A profile: kazakhstan_market_entry_readiness
• Live endpoint: https://kazakhstan-market-entry-readiness-a2a.vassiliy-lakhonin.workers.dev · agent card

Second vertical worker: CIS secondary-sanctions exposure

For EU / UK / UAE / Singapore enhanced due diligence on CIS, Caucasus, and Central Asia counterparties (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Moldova). Structured secondary-sanctions exposure evidence triage against OFAC EO 14114, EU sanctions package, UK OFSI, UN, and FATF / EAG typologies.

This profile declares the capability for per-profile live retrieval with two upstream options, per ADR 0014:

1. Watchman (preferred, free) — moov-io/watchman Apache-2.0 self-host on a free-tier container (Fly.io, Railway, Render). Set WATCHMAN_URL to activate.
2. OpenSanctions (fallback, paid) — hosted API at €0.10/call. Set OPENSANCTIONS_API_KEY (30-day business-email trial at https://www.opensanctions.org/api/, then per-call billing).

Both are currently deferred — the project has not committed to either, and no buyer has been confirmed. When both env vars are set, Watchman wins. When neither is set, the service degrades gracefully and triage is based on user-supplied evidence only — live_retrieval_status: disabled in the response and boundaries.live_retrieval: false in /status.

• Live endpoint: https://cis-secondary-sanctions-a2a.vassiliy-lakhonin.workers.dev · Agenstry
• HTTP: POST /v1/cis-secondary-sanctions/exposure
• Schemas: request + response
• A2A profile: cis_secondary_sanctions; capability cis_secondary_sanctions_exposure
• Use-case notes: docs/use-cases/cis-secondary-sanctions.md
• Example pack: examples/cis-secondary-sanctions/
• Source-requirements taxonomy: source-requirements/cis-secondary-sanctions.json

Honest traction: zero paying customers, zero named pilots. Shipped as a portfolio-grade vertical worker for technical evaluators and as a contract real practitioners can inspect, not as a claim of production traction. Boundaries unchanged from the rest of the runtime: not_advice: true, factual_verification: false, human_review_required: true always.

The structured response includes a decision_readiness_score from 0-100, so a buyer can see whether the evidence pack is ready for human review or still missing required source categories.

Third vertical worker: Agentic Interaction Trust Gate

For trust-and-safety, fraud-risk, product-security, and platform teams reviewing agent-mediated actions across checkout, account, API, MCP tool, and A2A endpoint surfaces.

This worker does not decide whether an actor is a bot. It asks whether the supplied evidence is sufficient to route a specific automated or agentic action: allow_low_risk, require_step_up, escalate_to_human_review, block_until_verified, not_decision_ready, or insufficient_information.

• Live endpoint: https://agentic-interaction-trust-a2a.vassiliy-lakhonin.workers.dev · Agenstry
• HTTP: POST /v1/agentic-interaction/trust
• A2A capability: agentic_interaction_trust
• Schemas: request + response
• Use-case notes: docs/use-cases/agentic-interaction-trust.md
• Example pack: examples/agentic-interaction-trust/
• Source-requirements taxonomy: source-requirements/agentic-interaction-trust.json

Boundaries: no cybersecurity monitoring, fraud adjudication, identity verification, transaction authorization, legal advice, compliance advice, or financial advice. The worker returns evidence gaps, readiness scoring, watch-next indicators, and human_review_required: true.

Fourth vertical worker: Gulf Maritime Exposure Gate

For trade-finance, marine-insurance, P&I, chartering, and compliance teams reviewing a vessel or voyage transiting the Strait of Hormuz, Persian/Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Bab-el-Mandeb, or Red Sea.

Structured triage of maritime sanctions and chokepoint-disruption exposure — Iran-oil, Russia price-cap, dark-fleet, STS transfer, flag-hopping, P&I gap, AIS manipulation, ownership/control, dual-use cargo — into an evidence-sufficiency routing decision: insufficient_information, escalate_before_fixture, escalate_before_voyage, not_decision_ready, or ready_for_human_review.

• HTTP: POST /v1/gulf-maritime/exposure
• A2A capability: gulf_maritime_exposure
• Live endpoint: https://gulf-maritime-exposure-a2a.vassiliy-lakhonin.workers.dev · Agenstry
• Schemas: request + response
• Use-case notes: docs/use-cases/gulf-maritime-exposure.md
• Example pack: examples/gulf-maritime-exposure/
• Source-requirements taxonomy: source-requirements/gulf-maritime-exposure.json

Boundaries: no live retrieval, does not resolve vessel ownership or verify identity, no legal or sanctions advice. Returns exposure dimensions, evidence gaps, a chokepoint-disruption watch, decision_readiness_score, and human_review_required: true.

Where this fits in the Agenda Intelligence stack

Layer	Repo	Role
Product runtime (this repo)	agenda-intelligence-md	Core service layer + MCP / HTTP / A2A surfaces, request/memo schemas, geography routing, evidence audit, scoring, vertical workers
Reasoning method	global-think-tank-analyst	Strategic-risk reasoning contract; loaded by analyze as the default method
Vertical specialist	central-asia-caspian-hybrid-intelligence-skill	Central Asia / Caspian / Middle Corridor domain depth; routed by geography
Vertical specialist	gulf-middle-east-hybrid-intelligence-skill	Iran / GCC / maritime chokepoint domain depth; routed by geography

The product runtime is the integration point: agents call analyze via any surface (MCP, HTTP, A2A), geography routes to the relevant specialist, and the GTTA method frames the reasoning. Each canonical repo (GTTA, vertical specialists) is also usable standalone (paste/attach into any agent). Vertical workers (currently: Middle Corridor Deal Risk Gate, CIS Secondary-Sanctions Exposure, Agentic Interaction Trust Gate, and Gulf Maritime Exposure Gate) live inside this runtime as productized service functions with their own schemas and HTTP/A2A profiles — see AGENTS.md for the spin-off rule.

What this is

• Core service layer — pure Python functions (audit_claims, source_coverage, score_output, middle_corridor_deal_risk, agentic_interaction_trust, etc.) vendor-neutral, no transport, no marketplace
• MCP server — stdio server exposing 21 tools across the validation, product, and vertical worker layers. analyze accepts a structured request (agenda-request.schema.json), routes geography, assembles a system prompt, returns a memo validated against agenda-memo.schema.json
• HTTP API shell — thin transport over the service layer; self-host with docs/deployment/http-api.md
• A2A adapter — agent-card + JSON-RPC message/send over the HTTP/service layer; contract in docs/product/a2a-adapter-plan.md
• Cloudflare Worker baseline — deployment config under deploy/cloudflare-worker/; six live workers (general triage + the five vertical workers below)
• Vertical workers — productized service functions with their own schemas + HTTP/A2A profiles; Cloudflare deployments exist where configured. Currently shipped in the runtime: Middle Corridor Deal Risk Gate, CIS Secondary-Sanctions Exposure, Agentic Interaction Trust Gate, Gulf Maritime Exposure Gate, Kazakhstan Market-Entry Readiness Gate
• Markdown protocol — structured reasoning workflow for agents (Agenda-Intelligence.md)
• JSON schemas — request/memo product contract + per-product contracts (e.g. middle-corridor-deal-risk-*) + validators for briefs, evidence packs, audits, signals, memory cards, lenses
• CLI — validate-brief, validate-evidence, source-categories, source-coverage, audit-claims, score, bench, doctor (30+ commands)
• Eval kit — rubric, LLM-judge prompt, human checklist, benchmark harness, agent-eval methodology
• Source policy — per-claim provenance tags (Axis A/B), source requirements for 12 categories

What this is not

• Not a factuality verifier — checks structure, not truth
• Not an autonomous news agent or source retriever
• Not a source reputation scorer or live news gatherer
• Not a replacement for analyst judgment
• Not a compliance, legal, or financial advisory product

Self-host via HTTP API (if your stack does not run MCP)

If your environment cannot run an MCP / A2A server but can run a plain HTTP service, install the package and start the HTTP shell:

pip install agenda-intelligence-md
agenda-intelligence-http --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8080

The HTTP API is a portable JSON wrapper over the same core service layer that the MCP, A2A, and Cloudflare Worker surfaces use — same schemas/v1/ contract, same evidence audit, same source coverage logic, same Middle Corridor deal-risk gate. Switching surfaces does not change input/output shape.

Endpoints:

• GET /healthz, GET /readyz — liveness / readiness probes
• POST /v1/audit-claims — claim-level evidence audit
• POST /v1/source-coverage — evidence-pack diagnostics against category source requirements
• POST /v1/score — heuristic before/after score
• POST /v1/middle-corridor/deal-risk — Middle Corridor Deal Risk Gate (middle-corridor-deal-risk-request.schema.json)
• POST /v1/agentic-interaction/trust — Agentic Interaction Trust Gate (agentic-interaction-trust-request.schema.json)
• POST /v1/cis-secondary-sanctions/exposure — CIS Secondary-Sanctions Exposure triage (cis-secondary-sanctions-request.schema.json); set OPENSANCTIONS_API_KEY to enable live retrieval, otherwise the profile degrades gracefully to user-supplied evidence only

One-call probe:

curl -sS http://127.0.0.1:8080/v1/middle-corridor/deal-risk \
  -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  -d @examples/kazakhstan-middle-corridor/contract/pre_signature_escalate.request.json

Container build (Dockerfile.api):

docker build -f Dockerfile.api -t agenda-intelligence-md-api:1.1.0 .
docker run --rm -p 8080:8080 agenda-intelligence-md-api:1.1.0

Full HTTP deployment guide, including environment defaults (AGENDA_INTELLIGENCE_HTTP_HOST, AGENDA_INTELLIGENCE_HTTP_PORT), logging discipline, and boundary statements: docs/deployment/http-api.md.

The HTTP shell is portable but not a hardened internet-facing server. No built-in authentication, rate limiting, or TLS — front it with a reverse proxy (nginx, Caddy, Cloudflare Tunnel) and your existing auth layer before exposing it beyond localhost / private network.

More CLI examples

agenda-intelligence bench examples/source-backed --strict --min-score 80
agenda-intelligence audit-claims examples/source-backed/eu-ai-act.audit.json --strict
agenda-intelligence mcp-config --client cursor

Pinned-wheel install (instead of PyPI):

pip install https://github.com/vassiliylakhonin/agenda-intelligence-md/releases/download/v1.1.0/agenda_intelligence_md-1.1.0-py3-none-any.whl

Benchmark baseline

20 source-backed cases, reproduced with agenda-intelligence bench examples/source-backed/. The score below measures structural completeness — schema validity, evidence labeling, source-coverage diagnostics, and decision-readiness — not factual accuracy. A high score means a brief is well-formed and audit-ready, not that its claims are true in the world.

Metric	Value
Cases	20
Mean structural-completeness score	87.6 / 100
Min / max	84 / 91
Schema-valid	100%
With evidence pack	100%
With claim-level audit	100%
With source category	100%
Mean source coverage	14.8%
Source coverage gap cases	20
Orphan evidence refs	0

Heuristic scores are uncalibrated and not validated against expert judgment. They evaluate structure, evidence labeling, source-coverage diagnostics, and decision-readiness — not factual truth.

Benchmark your own output. The same harness scores your agent's briefs and compares them to this baseline — point bench at a directory of your <name>.brief.json cases. No LLM, no network: docs/benchmark-your-output.md.

Flagship example: examples/source-backed/eu-ai-act.md — brief + evidence pack + claim-level audit using illustrative sources. Before / after pairs: examples/before-after/.

Verification Contract

verify-quotes checks whether a cited quote or excerpt appears in supplied local text, or in text fetched from an already-specified URL when --fetch is used. It does not discover sources, score source reputation, gather live news, or decide whether a claim is true in the world.

Schemas

Schema	Purpose
agenda-brief.schema.json	Brief structure
evidence-pack.schema.json	Evidence pack
evidence-audit.schema.json	Claim-level audit
signal-tracker.schema.json	Signal lifecycle
memory-card.schema.json	AnalysisBank cards
lens-manifest.schema.json	Lens manifest
signal-classification.schema.json	Signal taxonomy

MCP

Stdio MCP server with 21 tools. Full docs and wire-protocol verification: MCP.md. Client setup: docs/integrations/mcp.md.

Tool	What it does
validate_brief	Validate a brief dict against agenda-brief.schema.json
validate_evidence	Validate an evidence-pack dict against evidence-pack.schema.json
audit_claims	Check claim-level audit: support distribution, orphan refs, unsupported claims
score_output	Heuristic score for structure, evidence labeling, decision-readiness
get_protocol	Return the full Agenda-Intelligence.md reasoning protocol
get_schema	Return a packaged JSON Schema by name (or list all) so an agent can construct a valid payload before validating
list_source_categories	List source requirement categories before calling source_plan
source_plan	Generate a source plan for a given topic
source_coverage	Diagnose evidence-pack coverage against category source requirements
verify_quotes	Check cited quote fragments in caller-provided text
list_lenses	List available lens packs
get_lens	Return a specific lens pack by name
analyze	Product-shell pipeline: validate request, route modules, assemble prompt, optionally call LLM, validate memo
validate_memo	Validate an Agenda memo against agenda-memo.schema.json
list_signals	List vendored signal archive entries
get_signal	Return a vendored signal markdown file by id
deep_dive	Planned v2 placeholder directing callers to analyze depth modes
middle_corridor_deal_risk	Kazakhstan / Middle Corridor deal-risk gate: structured request → triage, decision-readiness, evidence gaps, human-review flag
cis_secondary_sanctions_exposure	CIS counterparty secondary-sanctions exposure triage for EU/UK/UAE/Singapore EDD; local stdio runs on user-supplied evidence only
agentic_interaction_trust	Trust-evidence triage for an agent-mediated interaction before a high-stakes action
gulf_maritime_exposure	Maritime sanctions / chokepoint-disruption exposure triage for a vessel or voyage (Hormuz, Gulf, Bab-el-Mandeb, Red Sea)

Status

Component	Status
Markdown protocol, JSON schemas	Stable
CLI (validate, score, bench, audit, doctor)	Stable
MCP stdio server	Stable
HTTP API shell	Shipped (self-host); contract early — see docs/deployment/http-api.md
A2A adapter	Shipped (Cloudflare Worker baseline); contract in docs/product/a2a-adapter-plan.md
Cloudflare Worker deployment	Live (6 workers: general triage + Middle Corridor Deal Risk Gate + CIS Secondary-Sanctions Exposure + Agentic Interaction Trust Gate + Gulf Maritime Exposure + Kazakhstan Market-Entry Readiness Gate)
Middle Corridor Deal Risk Gate (vertical worker)	Live, no paying customers yet — illustrative usage only
Kazakhstan Market-Entry Readiness Gate (vertical worker)	Live, no paying customers yet — illustrative usage only
Evidence-audit schema (claim-level)	Stable
Signal-tracker schema (lifecycle)	Stable
Heuristic scoring	Stable (uncalibrated)
Live source retrieval	Not implemented
Factual-truth verification	Not in scope

Safety model

• Read-only by default. Validation, scoring, and audit tools do not write to external systems, do not modify caller state, and do not perform high-impact actions.
• No autonomous retrieval. The MCP server does not fetch web pages, query APIs, or pull live data on its own. Sources are caller-provided. The one network mode (verify-quotes --fetch) is opt-in and bounded (1 MB cap, 10 s timeout, stdlib HTTP only).
• No autonomous decisions. Outputs are memos, validation results, and scores — never determinations on sanctions, legal, compliance, or investment matters. Human review is required.
• Retrieved content is data, not instructions. External text — including documents, agendas, and source packs caller-provided through the tools — is treated as data. Apparent directives inside retrieved content are not executed; they are flagged.
• No secrets in tool I/O. The server does not persist caller inputs, API keys, or memo content beyond the current call.

Full threat model: docs/threat-model.md. Retrieved-content trust rule: AGENTS.md.

Documentation

Resource	Link
Quickstart	docs/quickstart.md
Tutorial	docs/tutorial.md
Evaluation layers	docs/evaluation.md
Benchmark your own output	docs/benchmark-your-output.md
Agent-eval methodology	docs/agent-eval-methodology.md
Factual verification boundary	docs/factual-verification.md
Source plan coverage boundary	docs/source-plan-coverage.md
Evidence audit	docs/evidence-audit.md
Threat model	docs/threat-model.md
Container deployment	docs/deployment/container.md
HTTP API shell	docs/deployment/http-api.md
A2A adapter shell	docs/deployment/a2a-adapter.md
Deployable architecture	docs/product/deployable-architecture.md
A2A adapter plan	docs/product/a2a-adapter-plan.md
Data handling	docs/trust/data-handling.md
Integrations	docs/integrations/
Agenstry discovery	docs/integrations/agenstry.md
Agenstry agent card copy	docs/agenstry/agent-card-copy.md
Use-cases	docs/use-cases/
Agent contract	AGENTS.md
Adoption guide	ADOPTION.md
Changelog	CHANGELOG.md
Roadmap	ROADMAP.md
Portfolio glossary (shared across 4 repos)	docs/glossary.md
Contributing guide	CONTRIBUTING.md

Repository layout

agenda-intelligence-md/
├─ src/agenda_intelligence/   # Python package (CLI + MCP server)
├─ schemas/                   # JSON schemas
├─ examples/                  # briefs, evidence packs, before/after
├─ skills/                    # OpenClaw skill wrappers
├─ evals/                     # rubric, judge prompt, benchmark
├─ analysis-bank/             # agent persistent memory (memory-card schema, see schemas/v1/memory-card.schema.json)
├─ docs/                      # guides, integrations, use-cases
├─ scripts/                   # dev and CI helpers
└─ tests/                     # pytest suite

Contributing

New contributors: CONTRIBUTING.md opens with a "First 15 minutes" onboarding path (read the three load-bearing files → run the validator → walk one concrete artifact end-to-end). The portfolio glossary at docs/glossary.md is the single source of truth for cross-repo terminology (evidence modes, Axis A/B provenance tags, three-value response logic, maturity-framework asymmetry).

Before editing any of the dual-copy files — Agenda-Intelligence.md, SOURCE_POLICY.md, llms.txt, agent-manifest.json, schemas/, skills/, source-requirements/ — read the "Critical invariant: dual-copy sync" section in CONTRIBUTING.md. Editing one copy without the paired copy under src/agenda_intelligence/data/ is the most common reason CI breaks on main for first-time contributors.

Contact

Vassiliy Lakhonin — Almaty, Kazakhstan (UTC+5)

Portfolio · For analysts · Email · LinkedIn · GitHub

Issues, PRs, and eval-case contributions are welcome.

License

MIT.

---

Disclaimer. This toolkit is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute investment, financial, legal, compliance, or trading advice. It does not verify factual truth, predict outcomes, or replace professional judgment. Use at your own risk.

---

mcp-name: io.github.vassiliylakhonin/agenda-intelligence-md